Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Tereva v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1307 File number(s): QUD 130 of 2021
Judgment of: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 27 October 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review – application for habeas corpus – interlocutory application for bail – where exercise of discretion under s 501BA Migration Act 1958 (Cth) to set aside decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – absorbed person visa – "national interest" – whether decision of Minister unreasonable – whether s 501BA(3) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) valid CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – whether s 501BA(3) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) valid in terms of s 75(v) Constitution
Legislation: Constitution ss 75, 77 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 189, 196, 501BA
Cases cited: Al-Kateb v Godwin (2004) 219 CLR 562; [2004] HCA 37 Annetts v McCann (1990) 170 CLR 596 at 598; [1990] HCA 57 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57) Commissioner of Police v Tanos (1958) 98 CLR 383 at 395-396; [1958] HCA 6 Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Luppino [2021] FCAFC 43 Graham v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 33 Ibrahim v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 270 FCR 12; [2019] FCAFC 89 Madafferi v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 220 Maurangi v Bowen [2012] FCA 15 McHugh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 223 Minister for Home Affairs v DUA16 [2020] HCA 46 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541; [2018] HCA 30 Minister for Immigration v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476; [2003] HCA 2 Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391; [2001] HCA 51 Stewart v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 196 Vargas v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 162
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate