Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Watiwat v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2021] FCA 1327 Appeal from: Application for an extension of time to appeal: Watiwat and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2020] AATA 4683
File number(s): NSD 23 of 2021
Judgment of: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 29 October 2021
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – where applicant claimed entitlement to be paid the age pension at the single rate – application for extension of time to appeal decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal allowing the applicant's claim only in part – where proposed appeal would lack any merit – application dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 43, 44 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 33.12(2), 33.13 Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) ss 4, 8 Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) ss 4, 24 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 192B, 192D, 192E
Cases cited: FCFY v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1222 Haritos v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCAFC 92; (2015) 233 FCR 315 HGMZ v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2021] FCA 280 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 Jamal v Secretary of Social Services [2017] FCA 916 Wati v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 71 FCR 103 Watiwat and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2020] AATA 4683 Wentworth v Rogers (No 5) (1986) 6 NSWLR 534
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate