Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kemp v Westpac Banking Corporation (No 3) [2021] FCA 1366 File number: VID 134 of 2020
Judgment of: O'BRYAN J
Date of judgment: 3 November 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – representative proceeding – consumer credit insurance policies – case management –– application for further discovery
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M
Cases cited: Kemp v Westpac Banking Corporation (No 2) [2020] FCA 1392
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 34
Date of hearing: 18 October 2021
Counsel for the Applicant: Dr O Bigos SC with Ms G Coleman
Solicitor for the Applicant: Slater and Gordon
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr D Thomas SC with Mr P Holmes
Solicitor for the Respondents: Allens
ORDERS VID 134 of 2020
BETWEEN: ROGER KEMP Applicant
AND: WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION ACN 007 457 141 First Respondent
WESTPAC GENERAL INSURANCE LIMITED ACN 003 719 319 Second Respondent
WESTPAC LIFE INSURANCE SERVICES LIMITED ACN 003 149 157 Third Respondent
order made by: O'BRYAN J DATE OF ORDER: 3 november 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. On or before 17 December 2021, the respondents are to give discovery of the categories of documents identified in categories 1, 2 and 3 of Annexure A, together with a list of documents verified in accordance with r 20.17 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth). 2. Costs be reserved. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011. ANNEXURE A Terms defined in the Statement of Claim have the same meaning when used in these categories. No. Category 1. Emails sent or received by the employees listed in Annexure B in the Relevant Period, that attach a version of a document listed in Annexure C. 2. Emails dated 1 July 2009 or onwards, contained in the mailboxes of the employees listed in rows 2, 4 and 5 of Annexure B, that: (a) relate to: (i) the existence or absence of value, benefits and suitability of the Policies to customers as alleged in paragraphs 19 to 24 of the further amended statement of claim; or (ii) the deficiencies in the systems for sale and distribution of the Policies by the respondents and third parties (including without limitation Sykes Financial Services Pty Ltd and Peakbound Holdings) as alleged in paragraphs 34A to 35A of the further amended statement of claim; and (b) support the applicant's case or adversely affect the respondents' case. 3. THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT SETS ISSUED FROM 1 JANUARY 2010 IN SO FAR AS THEY RELATE TO THE POLICIES: (a) outlier reports, produced monthly; (b) unaccredited sales reports, produced weekly; (c) re-instatement reports, produced daily; and (d) Peakbound retention reports and covering email, produced weekly.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate