Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v KDR Victoria Pty Ltd t/a Yarra Trams [2021] FCA 1377 File number(s): VID 360 of 2021
Judgment of: WHEELAHAN J
Date of judgment: 22 November 2021
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS – construction of Yarra Trams Enterprise Agreement 2019 – Operations – whether the respondent employer proposes to contravene the Agreement with respect to meal break entitlements for tram drivers, thereby contravening s 50 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – where similar or same terms were in force in previous enterprise agreements – whether and how a common understanding between the parties as to the operation of the Agreement affects construction of the Agreement – on its proper construction, the proposed action would not contravene the Agreement.
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 50, 54(1)(a), 186 Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth) Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth)
Cases cited: ACE Insurance Ltd v Trifunovski [2011] FCA 1204; 200 FCR 532 Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Gardiner [2008] HCA 57; 238 CLR 570 Amcor Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2005] HCA 10; 222 CLR 241 Australian Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Workers Union v Prestige Property Services Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 11; 149 FCR 209 Carr v Western Australia [2007] HCA 47; 232 CLR 138 City of Wanneroo v Holmes (1989) 30 IR 362 at 378 Fair Work Ombudsman v Foot and Thai Massage Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 4) [2021] FCA 1242 Franklins Pty Ltd v Metcash Trading Ltd [2009] NSWCA 407; 76 NSWLR 603 Health Services Union v Ballarat Health Services [2011] FCA 1256 Josephson v Walker (1914) 18 CLR 691 King v Melbourne Vicentre Swimming Club Inc [2020] FCA 1173 King v Melbourne Vicentre Swimming Club Inc [2021] FCAFC 123; 308 IR 171 Merchant Service Guild of Australia v Sydney Steam Collier Owners and Coal Stevedores Association (1958) 1 FLR 248 Metropolitan Health Service Board v Australian Nursing Federation [2000] FCA 784; 99 FCR 95 Pagnan SpA v Tradax Ocean Transportation SA [1987] 3 All ER 565 Printing & Kindred Industries Union v Davies Bros Ltd (1986) 18 IR 444 Saraswati v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 1 Seaman's Union of Australia v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (1976) 46 FLR 444 Sheehan v Thiess Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1762 Shop Distributive and Allied Employees' Association v Woolworths Limited [2006] FCA 616; 151 FCR 513 Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees' Association v Target Australia Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 1038 Short v F W Hercus Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 72; 40 FCR 511 Textile, Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia v Givoni Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 1406; 121 IR 250 Theiss Pty Ltd v Sheehan [2020] FCAFC 198 Transport Workers Union v Linfox [2014] FCA 829; 318 ALR 54 Watcham v Attorney-General of the East Africa Protectorate [1919] AC 533 WorkPac v Skene [2018] FCAFC 131; 264 FCR 536
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate