Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Calvey v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1389 Appeal from: Calvey v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] AATA 277
File number: QUD 92 of 2021
Judgment of: ABRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 10 November 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – cancellation of Class TY Subclass 444 Special Category (Temporary) visa under s 503(3A) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where applicant failed to pass character test – application for judicial review of decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) affirming a decision of the delegate not to revoke cancellation – where Tribunal misconstrued paragraph 13.2(4)(f) of Direction 79 – whether Tribunal failed to consider best interests of the applicant's children – no jurisdictional error established – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 476A(1)(b), 501(3A), 501(6), 501(7), 501CA
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184; (2003) 236 FCR 593 Brown v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 141; (2015) 235 FCR 88 Calvey and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] AATA 277 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107; (2017) 252 FCR 352 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 456; (1993) 43 FCR 280 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; (2003) 197 ALR 389 ETA067 v Republic of Nauru [2018] HCA 46; (2018) 360 ALR 228 GBV18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 17; (2020) 274 FCR 202 Kaur v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCAFC 70 Minister for Home Affairs v Buadromo [2018] FCAFC 151; (2018) 267 FCR 320 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; (2019) 272 FCR 589 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v DRP17 [2018] FCAFC 198; (2018) 267 FCR 492 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Maioha [2018] FCAFC 216; (2018) 267 FCR 643 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] HCA 17; (2021) 95 ALJR 414 NABE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263; (2004) 144 FCR 1 Perez v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 450; (2002) 119 FCR 454 Say v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 84 Sebastian v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 31 Singh v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 3; (2019) 267 FCR 200
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate