Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Nassif v Seven Network (Operations) Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 1390 File number: NSD 1184 of 2019
Judgment of: ABRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 10 November 2021
Catchwords: COSTS – where respondents claim only liable for portion of the second applicant's costs – where respondents' defences unsuccessful – where second applicant awarded nominal damages
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43
Cases cited: Foots v Southern Cross Mine Management Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 56; (2007) 234 CLR 52 Gray v Richards (No 2) [2014] HCA 47; (2014) 89 ALJR 113 Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 2) [2015] FCA 750 Motium Pty Ltd v Arrow Electronics Australia Pty Limited [2011] WASCA 65 Murphy v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 432 Nassif v Seven Network (Operations) Ltd [2021] FCA 1286 Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; (1998) 193 CLR 72 Rockcote Enterprises Pty Ltd v FC Architects Pty Ltd; Carelli v FS Architects Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 39 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) [2001] FCA 1865; (2001) 115 FCR 229 Thiess Contractors Pty Ltd v Placer (Granny Smith) Pty Ltd [2001] WASCA 166 Victoria v Sportsbet Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 174
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
Number of paragraphs: 13
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate