Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Airport Handling Services Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2021] FCA 1405 File number(s): VID 48 of 2021; VID 49 of 2021 VID 50 of 2021; VID 51 of 2021 VID 52 of 2021; VID 53 of 2021 VID 54 of 2021; VID 56 of 2021
Judgment of: O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 15 November 2021
Catchwords: TAXATION – Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Act 2020 (Cth) – Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Rules 2020 (Cth) – Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Amendment Rules (No 2) 2020 (Cth) (the "JobKeeper scheme") – appeal from decision of Commissioner of Taxation to disallow Notice of Objection to decisions that applicants were not eligible for payments under JobKeeper scheme – where applicants Australian resident sovereign entities within the meaning of s 880-15 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) – where applicants had been eligible employers under the JobKeeper scheme – where applicants made payments in anticipation that they would be subsidised under the Jobkeeper scheme – where amendments made by Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Amendment Rules (No 2) 2020 (Cth) to criteria for eligibility as from a past date – whether legislative instrument operated retrospectively – whether applicants had rights as at the time of registration of legislative instrument that were "affected so as to disadvantage [them]" within the meaning of s 12 of the Legislation Act 2003 (Cth) – whether applicants "entitled" to JobKeeper payments under s 6(1) of Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Rules 2020 (Cth) as at past date STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – whether provisions of the Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Amendment Rules (No 2) 2020 (Cth) commenced before registration – where legislative instrument provided that the whole of the instrument "commenced" immediately after registration – where legislative instrument also provided that certain amendments applied in relation to periods of time before registration – whether legislative instrument operated retrospectively – whether "commences" in s 12 of the Legislation Act 2003 (Cth) has the same meaning as "take effect" – whether applicants had rights as at the time of registration of legislative instrument that were "affected so as to disadvantage [them]" within the meaning of s 12 of the Legislation Act 2003 (Cth) STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – whether provisions of the Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Amendment Rules (No 2) 2020 (Cth) were ultra vires – whether the text, context and purpose the Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Act 2020 (Cth) conferred authority to make rules with retrospective effect
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate