Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Kelly v New Zealand [2021] FCA 1434 File number(s): VID 524 of 2021
Judgment of: ANDERSON J
Date of judgment: 19 November 2021
Catchwords: EXTRADITION – surrender to New Zealand – Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) s 34(2); s 35 – where the applicant seeks review of an extradition decision in the Magistrates' Court ordering the applicant be surrendered to New Zealand under s 34(1)(c) of the Extradition Act 1988 – where the applicant was convicted in absentia of 46 offences under the Tax Administration Act 1994 (NZ) on 14 September 2015 – where the applicant claims that a lengthy period of time has elapsed since the alleged offences were committed and that her surrender would be unjust and oppressive due to being convicted in absentia – where the applicant seeks a declaration that the warrant for her arrest was not a valid New Zealand warrant for the purposes of the Act ('the warrant issue') – application dismissed
Legislation: Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) Tax Administration Act 1994 (NZ) New Zealand Criminal Procedure Act 2011
Cases cited: Bannister v New Zealand (1999) 86 FCR 417 Builders Licensing Board v Sperway Constructions (Sydney) Pty Ltd (1976) 135 CLR 616 Direct of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Kainhofer (1995) 185 CLR 528 Heslehurst v Government of New Zealand [2000] FCA 1311 Heslehurst v Government of New Zealand [2001] FCA 202; 109 FCR 226 Kenneally v New Zealand (1999) 91 FCR 292 Minister for Justice v Adamas (2013) 253 CLR 43 New Zealand v Moloney (2006) 154 FCR 250 New Zealand v Templeton [2017] FCA 745 Newman v New Zealand (2012) 206 FCR 1 Newman v New Zealand (No. 2) (2012) 206 FCR 17
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate