Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
COQ16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1438 Appeal from: COQ16 v Minister for Immigration & Anor and COK16 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2020] FCCA 2713
File numbers: VID 697 of 2020 VID 699 of 2020
Judgment of: O'BRYAN J
Date of judgment: 19 November 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – claim for protection grounded on claim of being harmed and fear of harm because of suspected connection with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam – refusal to grant protection visas under section 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – refusal upheld by Administrative Appeals Tribunal – application for review dismissed by Federal Circuit Court of Australia – appeals dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1)(d) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa), 65, 424(1), 427(1)(d), 476
Cases cited: Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] HCA 39; 259 ALR 429 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507 Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB (2004) 78 ALD 224 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate