Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ahamed v Secretary, Department of Human Services [2021] FCA 1441 Appeal from: Application for judicial review: CJCY and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2020] AATA 4939
File number(s): VID 827 of 2020
Judgment of: KERR J
Date of judgment: 23 November 2021
Catchwords: SOCIAL SECURITY – purported appeal from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – entitlement to a disability support pension – applicants entitlement to rent assistance – objection to competency – objection upheld
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011(Cth)
Cases cited: CJCY and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2020] AATA 4939 Haritos v Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCAFC 92
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 43
Date of hearing: 6 September 2021
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Brown
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS VID 827 of 2020
BETWEEN: MOHAMMAD AHAMED Applicant
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES Respondent
order made by: KERR J DATE OF ORDER: 23 NOVEMBER 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Respondent's Notice of Objection to Competency filed 24 March 2021 be upheld. 2. The Applicant's amended Notice of Appeal filed 14 May 2021 be dismissed. 3. The Applicant pay the Respondent's costs as may be agreed, or in default of agreement, as may be taxed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate