Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
ECE21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCA 1447 File number: WAD 104 of 2021
Judgment of: JACKSON J
Date of judgment: 22 November 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION - application for judicial review of a decision made by the Minister under s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) not to revoke the cancellation of the applicant's visa - whether the Minister failed to make findings on claims made by the applicant to engage Australia's protection obligations - whether the Minister engaged in an active intellectual process when considering the claims - characterisation of the Minister's findings - Minister rejected claims on the basis of lack of evidence - in the circumstances Minister not obliged to consider the probability that harm would occur - adequate engagement with the claims - application dismissed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - suppression orders - applicant a citizen of South Sudan - Minister accepted that Australia owed non-refoulement obligations to the applicant - real risk of serious harm to the applicant if returned to South Sudan - s 91X of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) not applicable - suppression order under s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) necessary to protect the safety of the applicant - applicant's name suppressed and pseudonym applied
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AF, 37AG Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5AAA, 91X, 197C, 198, 501, 501CA
Cases cited: AB (a pseudonym) v CD (a pseudonym) [2019] HCA 6; (2019) 364 ALR 202 BCR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 96; (2017) 248 FCR 456 BVT20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 222; (2020) 385 ALR 286 Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 Eshetu v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 142 ALR 474 EXT20 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCA 629 G v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1229; (2018) 266 FCR 511 Minister for Home Affairs v G [2019] FCAFC 79; (2019) 266 FCR 569 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; (2019) 272 FCR 589 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingam (1999) 93 FCR 220 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v CTB19 [2020] FCAFC 166; (2020) 280 FCR 178 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] HCA 17; (2021) 390 ALR 590 MZXSA v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCAFC 123; (2010) 117 ALD 441 Perera v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 403 Warnakulasuriya v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (unreported, Finkelstein J, 6 April 1998)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate