Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Niardone v Clubb (No 3) [2021] FCA 1449 File number: WAD 7 of 2021
Judgment of: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 19 November 2021
Catchwords: COSTS - assessment of costs of urgent injunction application and cross-claim proceedings - where both parties seek payment of costs of proceedings - where respondent/cross-claimant appointed administrators to company to recover disputed fees - where orders made for appointment of administrators to be brought to an end - where party appointing administrators subsequently found to be successful as to claim to very limited extent as to entitlement to due diligence fee - where company indicated willingness to pay due diligence fee prior to appointment of administrators if not for insistence on payment of other disputed fees - whether conduct in appointing administrators unreasonable or justified on basis of limited success - whether provision in agreement between parties providing for liability for recovery costs applies - whether appropriate to award costs on indemnity basis by reason of unreasonable conduct in relation to offers to compromise - whether offers of compromise complied with Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 435A, 435C, 447A Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 43, 51A Personal Properties Securities Act 2009 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 25.14, Part 25
Cases cited: Anchorage Capital Partners Pty Limited v ACPA Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 112 Clifton (Liquidator) v Kerry J Investment Pty Ltd t/as Clenergy (No 2) [2020] FCAFC 112; (2020) 277 FCR 382 Createc Pty Ltd v Design Signs Pty Ltd [2009] WASCA 85 Dr Martens Australia Pty Ltd v Figgins Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2000] FCA 602 Firebird Global Master Fund II Ltd v Republic of Nauru (No 2) [2015] HCA 53 Foots v Southern Cross Mine Management Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 56; (2007) 234 CLR 52 Forsyth v Sinclair (No 2) [2010] VSCA 195; (2010) 28 VR 635 Gray v Richards (No 2) [2014] HCA 47 Grocon Constructors (Qld) Pty Ltd v Dexus Funds Management Limited as Trustee for the Dexus 480Q Trust (No 2) [2019] FCA 1117 Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 2) [2015] FCA 750; (2015) 237 FCR 127 Kazar (Liquidator) v Kargarian; In the matter of Frontier Architects Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2011] FCAFC 136; (2011) 197 FCR 113 Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 27; (2016) 247 FCR 61 Meehan v Glazier Holdings Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 24 Motium Pty Ltd v Arrow Electronics Australia Pty Ltd [2011] WASCA 65 (S) Nassif v Seven Network (Operations) Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 1390 Niardone v Clubb [2021] FCA 14 Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Pinot Nominees Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2009] FCA 1508; (2009) 181 FCR 392 Queensland North Australia Pty Ltd v Takeovers Panel (No 2) [2015] FCAFC 128; (2015) 236 FCR 370 Re Sales Express Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) [2014] NSWSC 460 Re Wollongong Coal Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1680 Snedden v Republic of Croatia (No 2) [2009] FCAFC 132 Spacorp Australia Pty Ltd v Fitzgerald [2001] VSC 61 Stewart v Atco Controls Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2014] HCA 31; (2014) 252 CLR 331 Trustee for The MTGI Trust v Johnston (No 2) [2016] FCAFC 190
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate