Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ross on behalf of the Cape York United #1 Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 3) (Uutaalnganu (Night Island) determination) [2021] FCA 1465 File number(s): QUD 673 of 2014
Judgment of: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 25 November 2021
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – consent determination – authorisation – exercise of discretion under s 84D of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – nomination of new prescribed body corporate
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 84D, 87A, 225
Cases cited: Akiba v Queensland (No 3) [2010] FCA 643; 204 FCR 1 Ashwin (on behalf of the Wutha People) v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2019] FCA 308; 369 ALR 1 Commonwealth v Clifton [2007] FCAFC 190; 164 FCR 355 Drury on behalf of the Nanda People v State of Western Australia [2018] FCA 1849 Drury on behalf of the Nanda People v Western Australia [2020] FCAFC 69; 276 FCR 203 Harrington-Smith on behalf of the Wongatha People v Western Australia (No 9) [2007] FCA 31; 238 ALR 1 Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2021] FCA 1122 Taylor on behalf of the Yamatji Nation Claim v State of Western Australia [2020] FCA 42
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Native Title
Number of paragraphs: 91
Date of hearing: 25 November 2021
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate