Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Frigger v Trenfield (No 3) [2021] FCA 1471 File number: WAD 66 of 2021
Judgment of: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 4 November 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application to vacate the prior orders of the Court adjourning the applicants' application –where adjournment application was not opposed by the applicants – where appropriate remedy would be for the applicants to seek leave for an extension of time in which to appeal the Court's decision – interlocutory application dismissed
Cases cited: Frigger v Trenfield (No 2) [2021] FCA 1255 Kitay, in the matter of Frigger (No 2) [2018] FCA 1032
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 4
Date of hearing: 4 November 2021
Counsel for the Applicants: The Applicants appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr SD Majteles
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Carles Solicitors
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Herbert Smith Freehills
ORDERS WAD 66 of 2021
BETWEEN: ANGELA CECILIA THERESA FRIGGER First Applicant
HARTMUT HUBERT JOSEF FRIGGER Second Applicant
AND: KELLY TRENFIELD First Respondent
MERVYN JOHN KITAY Second Respondent
order made by: LOGAN J DATE OF ORDER: 4 NOVEMBER 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicants' letter of 20 October 2021 to the associate to Justice Logan be marked as Exhibit 1. 2. Exhibit 1 be deemed to be an interlocutory application for the vacation of Order 2 of the Orders made on 18 August 2021. 3. That deemed interlocutory application be dismissed. 4. The applicants have leave to file and serve on or before 11 November 2021 submissions of not more than 1 page as to why costs of the dismissal of the application should not follow the event. 5. In default of the filing of any such submission, the order be that the applicant pay the costs of each respondent, to be fixed by a Registrar if not agreed. 6. If such submission be filed by the applicants, the respondents have leave to file and serve such submissions in reply of not more than 1 page on or before 18 November 2021. Thereafter the question of costs be determined on the papers. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate