Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Frigger v Trenfield (No 4) [2021] FCA 1472 File number: WAD 66 of 2021
Judgment of: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 24 November 2021
Catchwords: COSTS – where applicants had filed an interlocutory application seeking to vacate the orders of the Court adjourning the applicants' application – where applicants had not opposed the adjournment application – where applicants' interlocutory application was dismissed – where applicants' allege conduct of second respondent is contravention of s 37M and s 37N of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – no such breach proved – where first respondent submit costs should be fixed in the sum $1,000.00 – no basis for the Court for such sum – costs awarded against the applicants in a sum to be fixed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37M, 37N
Cases cited: Frigger v Trenfield (No 2) [2021] FCA 1255 Frigger v Trenfield (No 3) [2021] FCA 1471 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 13
Date of last submissions filed by the Applicant: 11 November 2021
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate