Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Mazda Australia Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 1493 File number(s): VID 1169 of 2019
Judgment of: O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 30 November 2021
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – prohibition on misleading or deceptive conduct under s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) – prohibition on certain false or misleading representations under s 29(1)(m) of the ACL – statutory guarantee as to acceptable quality under s 54 of the ACL – consumer's entitlement to reject goods under s 259 of the ACL – representations made as to consumer rights under statutory guarantee provisions of the ACL – representations made as to supplier's right to repair goods regardless of consumer's entitlement to reject goods – representations made in the nature of opinions – whether reasonable basis existed for making representations in the nature of opinions – where supplier gave no consideration to consumers' entitlements to a refund or replacement under the ACL – whether misleading or deceptive CONSUMER LAW – prohibition on unconscionable conduct under s 21 of the ACL – where no allegation of "system" or "pattern" of conduct – whether respondent's conduct unconscionable
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Schedule 2 ss 3, 7, 18, 18(1), 21, 22, 29(1), 29(1)(m), 54, 54(2)(c), 259, 259(2), 259(2)(b), 259(3), 259(3)(a), 260, 260(1)(a), 260(1)(c), 260(1)(e), 262, 262(1), 262(2), 263, 263(4), 263(4)(a), 263(4)(b), 263(6), Parts 3-2, Part 5-4, Part 5-4 Div 1 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 5.04(3) item 19
Cases cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Delor Vue Apartments CTS 39788 [2021] FCAFC 121; (2021) 153 ACSR 522 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jayco Corporation Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1672 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jewellery Group Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 848; (2012) 293 ALR 335 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Quantum Housing Group Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 40; (2021) 388 ALR 577 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2020) 278 FCR 450 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Valve Corporation (No 3) [2016] FCA 196; (2016) 337 ALR 647 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v AGM Markets Pty Ltd (No 3) (2020) 275 FCR 57 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Kobelt (2019) 267 CLR 1 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 592 Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304 Capic v Ford Motor Company (No 3) [2017] FCA 771 ConAgra Inc v McCain Foods (Aust) Pty Ltd (1992) 33 FCR 302 Hall (Inspector of Taxes) v Lorimer [1992] 1 WLR 939 Global Sportsman Pty Ltd v Mirror Newspapers Ltd (1984) 2 FCR 82 Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2013) 249 CLR 435 Medtel Pty Ltd v Courtney (2003) 130 FCR 182 Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2016) 258 CLR 525 Transport Industries Insurance Co Ltd v Longmuir [1997] 1 VR 125 Unique International College Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2018) 266 FCR 631 Vautin v By Winddown, Inc. (formerly Bertram Yachts) (No 4) [2018] FCA 426; (2018) 362 ALR 702
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate