Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Frigger v Trenfield (No 10) [2021] FCA 1500 File number: WAD 141 of 2019
Judgment of: JACKSON J
Date of judgment: 1 December 2021
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY - application for declarations that various assets held in regulated superannuation fund and so not divisible among creditors - s 116(2)(d)(iii)(A) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) - principles as to when an asset is part of a fund - beneficial or remedial legislation - possible disposition of property after sequestration orders - purported dispositions ineffective - finding that assets not held in regulated superannuation fund - application dismissed SUPERANNUATION - meaning of 'regulated superannuation fund' in Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1996 (Cth) (SIS Act) - finding that applicants' SMSF is a regulated superannuation fund - duties of trustees of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) - failure to adequately distinguish SMSF assets and personal assets - purported contributions not compliant with SMSF trust deed - alleged contribution of residential property to SMSF in breach of s 65 and s 66 of the SIS Act - meaning of 'business real property' - contributions not effective and would have infringed SIS Act - failure to establish that claimed assets formed part of SMSF TRUSTS AND TRUSTEES - creation of express trusts - objective manifestation of intention - inferring intention - burden of proving existence of trust - lack of written evidence manifesting required intention - no reliable evidence of objective manifestation of intention before sequestration order - documents put before court deliberately altered by first applicant - mixing of trust funds and personal funds - significance of registration of 'trust receipts' on Personal Property Securities Register - whether notification of tax file number to financial institutions an objective manifestation of intention - uncertainty as to mechanism of contribution - uncertainty as to beneficiaries - no trust established over certain assets - construction of declarations of trust - lack of objective intention to transfer legal title to other trustees of SMSF - declarations effective to create separate trust, but not effective to contribute properties to SMSF BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY - administration of bankrupt estates - duties of trustee in bankruptcy - application for order removing trustee in bankruptcy - effect of bankruptcy on separate legal proceedings - claim that trustee not 'competent' to sign consent orders in separate proceedings by virtue of s 58(3) of the Bankruptcy Act - costs liabilities are debts provable in bankruptcy - s 58(3) only applies in respect of steps in proceedings commenced by creditors - successful appeal parties secured creditors due to security for costs - no proven loss or damage - claim relating to consent orders dismissed - alleged failure to take necessary steps in administration of bankrupt estate - inhibiting bankrupts' dealings with assets - allegation of improper purpose - allegations that trustee in bankruptcy gave false evidence - scope of trustee in bankruptcy's investigatory inquiries - allegation of collusion with third party - uncooperative and belligerent bankrupts - reasonable for trustee in bankruptcy to form view that it was not necessary to interview bankrupts - application for removal dismissed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate