Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Budini v Sunnyfield (No 3) [2021] FCA 1540 File number(s): SAD 266 of 2018
Judgment of: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 10 December 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by litigation representative for approval of settlement – where applicant under legal incapacity due to disability – consideration of relevant factors for approval of settlement – settlement approved
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law (contained in Sch 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2020 (Cth)) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37AG Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 9.70, 9.71 Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 (NSW)
Cases cited: Butler v Djerriwarrh Employment & Education Services Inc [2015] FCA 296 Elliott v Victoria (Department of Education & Training) [2018] FCA 1029 Fish v NSW Department of Education and Training [2018] FCA 434 James v WorkPower Inc [2019] FCA 1239 Modra v Victoria (Department of Human Services Victoria & Department of Education and Early Childhood Development) [2013] FCA 1041 Mununggurr v Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 2188 Re Barbour's Settlement; National Westminster Bank Ltd v Barbour [1974] 1 All ER 1188 Scandolera (by his next friend Robinson) v Victoria (Department of Education and Early Childhood Development) [2015] FCA 1451; (2015) 331 ALR 525
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate