Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Pulini v Assistant Minister to the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia [2021] FCA 1543 Review of: Decision of the Assistant Minister to the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia
File number: QUD 149 of 2021
Judgment of: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 10 December 2021
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for judicial review of decisions of the Assistant Minister to refuse the applicants parole – whether Assistant Minister failed to consider the applicants' submission that their rehabilitative progress made the present time optimal for their release – ground rejected – whether Assistant Minister failed to consider submission that the applicants' youngest child was struggling in their absence – ground upheld – consideration of materiality of error – whether Assistant Minister's reliance on risk to community safety in the absence of express reasoning or findings was illogical or legally unreasonable – ground dismissed – whether Assistant Minister's reasons were inadequate – ground dismissed – application allowed – Assistant Minister's decisions set aside and remitted
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25D Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 16 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) ss 19AB, 19AKA, 19AL, 19ALA and 19ALB Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 430(1)
Cases cited: Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 252 FCR 352 Dornan v Riordan (1990) 24 FCR 564 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 389; [2003] HCA 26 Duxerty v Minister for Justice and Customs [2002] FCA 1518; (2002) 136 A Crim R 373 Khazaal v Attorney-General [2020] FCA 448 Leggett v Queensland Parole Board [2012] QSC 121 Lodhi v Attorney-General (Cth) [2020] FCA 1383 McGrane v Queensland State Parole Board [2010] QSC 209 Minister for Home Affairs v Ogawa (2019) 269 FCR 536 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar (2019) 272 FCR 589 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Eden (2016) 240 FCR 158 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Sabharwal [2018] FCAFC 160 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSRS [2014] FCAFC 16; (2014) 309 ALR 67 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 Muggeridge v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 255 FCR 81 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] HCA 17; (2021) 390 ALR 590 MZZGE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 72 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1 NBMZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 220 FCR 1 Re The Australian Bank Employees Union; Ex Parte Citicorp Australia Limited (1989) 167 CLR 513 Soliman v University of Technology, Sydney (2012) 207 FCR 277 Williams v Minister for the Environment and Heritage (2003) 74 ALD 124
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate