Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
LPSP v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1563 File number: VID 323 of 2021
Judgment of: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 15 December 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for judicial review of a direction made under s 33 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – interpretation of s 33 of the Act – whether a direction compelling a party to participate in a psychiatric examination involuntarily was authorised by s 33 of the Act – statutory presumption that a direction of a court or tribunal which interferes with the liberty of an individual generally requires specific statutory authority – common law right to privacy – whether the direction was legally unreasonable – whether the direction was an improper exercise of power because it was uncertain – application granted on the basis that the direction was not authorised by s 33 of the Act
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 2, 33, 43(1), 63(2) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5, 16(1)(a) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Human Rights Act 1998 (UK) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(1C), 60, 427(1)(d) Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) s 62
Cases cited: Buzzacott v Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (2013) 215 FCR 301 Cann's Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth (1946) 71 CLR 210 Charara v Commissioner of Taxation [2016] FCA 451 Director of Public Prosecutions v Kaba (2014) 44 VR 526 Furesh v Schor (2013) 45 WAR 546 Hastwell v Kott Gunning (No 5) [2020] FCA 621 Hastwell v Kott Gunning [2021] FCAFC 70 King Gee Clothing Co Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth (1945) 71 CLR 184 Lawyers for Forests Inc v Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts [2009] FCA 330 Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia v HSK (2019) 1 QR 600 Randwick City Council v Minister for the Environment [1998] FCA 1376; 54 ALD 682 S v S [1972] AC 24 Sunland Group Limited v Gold Coast City Council [2021] HCA 35 Judicial Review of Administrative Action and Government Liability (6th ed, Lawbook Co, 2017)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate