Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
FAK19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2021] FCA 1571 Review of: QDWQ v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] AATA 4622
File number: SAD 279 of 2019
Judgment of: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 16 December 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – successful application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – order in nature of mandamus requiring Tribunal to conduct a review of a migration decision according to law – no party applying for stay of the order – Full Court dismissing an appeal from the order – application for special leave to appeal from the judgment of the Full Court presently pending in the High Court of Australia – Tribunal deciding of its own initiative not to review the migration decision until outcome of High Court proceeding is known – whether Tribunal has failed to comply with this Court's order – applicant's personal liberty potentially affected by Tribunal's delay – whether Tribunal should be ordered to make a return to this Court as though a writ of mandamus had issued – whether Tribunal should be ordered to make a return within 42 days – relief granted
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 42A, 42B, 42C, 43 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 29, 38 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 13, 14, 65, 189, 476A, 500, 501, 501CA Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 36.08 High Court Rules 2004 (Cth) rr 25.13.4, 42.09
Cases cited: FAK19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1124 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v FAK19 [2021] FCAFC 153 Obeid v The Queen [2016] HCA 9; 329 ALR 372
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate