Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Martens on behalf of the Kunggandji Gurrabuna People of Kamoi (Kimoi or Kimuy) v State of Queensland [2021] FCA 1577 File number: QUD 21 of 2019
Judgment of: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 16 December 2021
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – questions concerning the existence of native title referred to referees with the consent of the authorised applicant – referees expressing opinions as to the possession of native title at sovereignty in a defined area – Court adopting the referees' report – adoption of the report rendering claims in a proceeding factually untenable in the defined area – native title claimant application dismissed pursuant to r 28.67(1)(e) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – decision of Registrar of National Native Title Tribunal not to accept a native title claimant application for registration – avenues of appeal and review of the Registrar's decision exhausted – applicant unwilling to amend claim – native title claimant application unlikely to be amended in a way that would lead to a different outcome upon reconsideration by the Registrar – no other reason why application should not be dismissed – relevance of likelihood of success of amended proceedings confined to particular parts of the current claim area – balance of native title claimant application dismissed pursuant to s 190F(6) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate