Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Kumar v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1580 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal from: Kumar & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2020] FCCA 999
File number: VID 226 of 2020
Judgment of: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 13 December 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for leave to appeal from Federal Circuit Court of Australia – employer nomination visa – where the employer nomination had not been approved – whether proposed appeal had any merit – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 359A Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Sch 2, cl 186.223 Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, rr 13.03C, 44.12
Cases cited: Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 10
Date of hearing: 13 December 2021
Solicitor for the Applicants: Mr GSR Singh, Quantum Legal Advisory & Migration Consultants Pty Ltd
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Mr D Brown, Australian Government Solicitor
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: The second respondent filed a submitting notice, save as to costs
ORDERS VID 226 of 2020
BETWEEN: SUNIL KUMAR First Applicant
KAVYA JANGRA Second Applicant
NISHA KUMARI Third Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate