Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Turnbull trading as Berry Family Law v Google LLC [2021] FCA 1589 File number: VID 478 of 2021
Judgment of: ANASTASSIOU J
Date of judgment: 24 November 2021
Date of publication of reasons: 15 December 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for preliminary discovery pursuant to r 7.22 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – prospective respondent did not appear – allegedly defamatory comments made online – whether the requirements for leave to serve outside the jurisdiction in rr 10.42 and 10.43 of the Rules have been met – whether the prospective applicant has a prima facie case for all or any of the relief claimed – where prospective applicant seeks orders for substituted service in addition to service by registered post in accordance with the Hague Convention – whether substituted service ought to be granted – orders for substituted service refused – application granted
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 7.22(1), 10.42, 10.43
Cases cited: Kabbabe v Google LLC [2020] FCA 126 Kandola v Google LLC [2021] FCA 1262 Kukulka v Google LLC [2020] FCA 1229 Lin v Google LLC [2021] FCA 1113 Musicki v Google LLC [2021] FCA 1393 Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters done at the Hague on 15 November 1965, Art 10
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate