Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ambrose v Badcock, in the matter of Badcock [2021] FCA 1647 File number: SAD 134 of 2021
Judgment of: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 24 December 2021
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – after-acquired property – whether income transferred to an interest bearing bank account constitutes after-acquired property to which ss 58 and 116 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) refers – application for declarations rejected.
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 5, 54, 58, 81, 116, 139K, 139L, 139P, 139R, 139W, 149, 156A Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 394 Social Security Act 1991 (Cth)
Cases cited: Barwick v Goodridge [2011] NSWSC 1233; (2011) 255 FLR 245 Combis v Harding [2014] FCA 1391 Davey v Dessco Pty Ltd [2017] VSC 744 Devine v State of Queensland [2020] QSC 229 Di Cioccio v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2015] FCAFC 30; (2015) 229 FCR 1 Gittins v Field (Trustee) [2018] FCA 976 Michell, in the matter of Lee [2012] FCA 1046; (2012) 207 FCR 96 Randall v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2008] FCA 1939; (2008) 174 FCR 441 Re Gillies; Ex parte Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Gilles [1993] FCA 289; (1993) 42 FCR 571 Re Hawkins; Ex parte Worrell (1996) 71 FCR 371 Re Sharpe; Ex parte Donnelly (1998) 80 FCR 536 Rodway v White [2009] WASC 201; (2009) 233 FLR 262 Trustee of the Property of O'Reilly v Law Society of New South Wales [2001] FCA 701; (2001) 110 FCR 574
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate