Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Henry v Sandlewood Aboriginal Projects Limited (No 5) [2021] FCA 1648 File number(s): QUD 280 of 2017
Judgment of: RARES J
Date of judgment: 22 November 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment under r 5.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 – where respondent in default under r 5.22 – where statement of claim alleged respondent breached fiduciary duties owed to the corporate applicant by misapplying funds for personal benefit – default judgment awarded
Legislation: Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 r 5.23
Cases cited: Henry v Sandlewood Aboriginal Projects Limited (No 2) [2019] FCA 2061 Henry v Sandlewood Aboriginal Projects Limited (No 3) [2021] FCA 728 Henry v Western Downs Group Ltd [2018] FCA 1168
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Native Title
Number of paragraphs: 16
Date of hearing: 22 November 2021
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr P. Somers
Solicitor for the Applicants: Mr T. Hauff
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr D. Atkinson QC
Solicitor for the First Respondent: DLA Piper
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent did not appear
Counsel for the Third Respondent: The third respondent did not appear
Counsel for the Fourth Respondent: The fourth respondent did not appear
Counsel for the Fifth Respondent: The fifth respondent did not appear
Counsel for the Sixth Respondent: The sixth respondent did not appear
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate