Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Goyal, in the matter of Cape Technologies Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) [2021] FCA 1654 File number: NSD 1159 of 2021
Judgment of: YATES J
Date of judgment: 11 November 2021
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application by administrators for an order, pursuant to s 90-15 of Sch 2 to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), that they would be justified in causing the sale of the second plaintiff's assets.
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 435A, 437A(1)(c) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Schedule 2, Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations) s 90–15 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37AF
Cases cited: Hill, in the matter of Autocare Services Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) [2021] FCA 167 In the matter of Ansett Australia Ltd and Korda (No 3) [2002] FCA 90; 115 FCR 409 Killer, in the matter of North Coast Wood Panels Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) [2011] FCA 776 Re Advanced Medical Institute Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) [2011] NSWSC 574 Re Eisa Ltd (administrators appointed) [2000] NSWSC 940; (2000) 35 ACSR 394 Re Keystone Group Holdings Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) [2016] NSWSC 1604 Reidy, in the matter of eChoice Ltd (administrators appointed) [2017] FCA 1582
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 30
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate