Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Leggett v Hawkesbury Race Club Limited (No 3) [2021] FCA 1658 File number(s): NSD 1554 of 2019
Judgment of: RARES J
Date of judgment: 24 December 2021
Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE – duty of care – employer's duty to protect employee from reasonably foreseeable risk of sustaining psychiatric injury – Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) Pt 5 – where CEO bullied and micromanaged employee – where employee complained to CEO about employment conditions and failure to provide safe system of work – where CEO ignored complaints and persisted in conduct – where employee complained to several directors of employer's board about effect of CEO's conduct on her health – where board directors failed to act – whether employee displayed signs she was at risk of psychiatric injury to employer's "agents to know" – whether employee's descriptions of her state of mind to CEO and board directors would convey to reasonable employer that she was at risk of psychiatric injury – held: employer negligent – employee entitled to work injury damages pursuant to s 151E Workers Compensation Act. INDUSTRIAL LAW – adverse action – Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 87, 323, 340(1)(c)(ii) – Long Service Leave Act 1955 (NSW) s 4 – where CEO threatened to performance manage employee in response her complaints about his conduct and failure to provide safe system of work – whether employee's workplace right to make complaint under s 340(1)(c)(ii) of Fair Work Act needed only to be underpinned by an entitlement or right or also had to be based on an instrumental source – where CEO withheld payment of entitlements because employee had exercised workplace right to make a complaint and to take sick leave – where CEO failed to pay annual and long service leave to employee – whether employee could rely on presumption in s 361 of the Fair Work Act when it had not been pleaded – found not necessary to plead s 361 in order to rely on presumption. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – whether Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to make orders under Long Service Leave Act 1995 (NSW) – whether Long Service Leave Act "picked up" by s 79 of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) in matter involving termination of employment relationship and claims of contraventions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). CONTRACT – where employee paid by commission – where no express term of contract as to time for payment – where parties had dealt with each other over many years and employer always paid within 14 days of claim for commission – whether estoppel by convention based on course of dealing.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate