Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (Kiama Aged Care Centre Case) (No 2) [2022] FCA 19 File number(s): NSD 2057 of 2019
Judgment of: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 21 January 2022
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW — contraventions of ss 500 and 503 of Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) at a building site on two consecutive days — where union official contravened s 500 twice and s 503 once on first day — where same official and second official each contravened s 500 on second day — where union liable for each of the contraventions of the officials — whether declarations should be made in respect of each contravention — assessment of penalties —whether contraventions across both days should be treated as the same course of conduct — whether one union official suffered "extra-curial punishment" due to media reporting — whether personal payment orders should be made
Legislation: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 4AA Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)ss 500, 503, 539, 545, 546, 550, 556, 557, 570, 793 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 16.02(1)
Cases cited: Australian Automotive Repairers' Association (Political Action Committee) Inc v NRMA Insurance Limited [2002] FCA 1568 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (Kiama Aged Care Centre Case) [2021] FCA 920 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Brooker Highway Case) (No 2) [2018] FCA 1214; 280 IR 356 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2017) 254 FCR 68 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Nine Brisbane Sites Appeal) (2019) 269 FCR 262 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Adelaide Airport Case) [2021] FCA 951 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Constitution Place Case) [2020] FCA 1070; 299 IR 231 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (the WGC Cranes Case) [2021] FCA 622; 307 IR 411 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Menon [2020] FCA 1418 Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Non-Indemnification Personal Payment Case) (2018) 264 FCR 155 Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (The Bay Street Appeal) (2020) 282 FCR 1 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39; 194 IR 461; 269 ALR 1 Cruse v Multiplex Ltd (2008) 172 FCR 279 Do Carmo v Ford Excavations Pty Ltd (1984) 154 CLR 234 Fair Work Ombudsman v NSH North Pty Ltd trading as New Shanghai Charlestown [2017] FCA 1301; 275 IR 148 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Mornington Inn Pty Ltd v Jordan (2008) 168 FCR 383 Parker v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (2019) 270 FCR 39 Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (2020) 282 FCR 580 Rocky Holdings Pty Ltd v Fair Work Ombudsman (2014) 221 FCR 153 Williams v Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy Union (No 2) [2009] FCA 548; 182 IR 327
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate