Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
AHZ19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 58 Appeal from: AHZ19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCCA 648
File number(s): VID 221 of 2021
Judgment of: O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 4 February 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from decision dismissing application for review of a decision of the AAT – where AAT not satisfied that the applicants were non-citizens in respect of whom Australia had protection obligations under ss 36(2)(a) or 36(2)(aa) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where AAT made adverse credibility findings and disbelieved appellants' claims – whether AAT acted unreasonably or failed to interpret or apply ss 5H, 5J, 36(2)(a) and/or 36(2)(aa) of the Migration Act – whether AAT failed to have proper regard to a corroborative document provided by the appellant in making adverse credibility findings – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5H, 5J, 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa)
Cases cited: BZD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 263 FCR 292 Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 CQG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 253 FCR 496 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 97 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZNPG [2010] FCAFC 51; (2010) 115 ALD 303 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZNSP (2010) 184 FCR 485 WAJS v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 240 FCR 139
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate