Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Wong v Wong [2022] FCA 78 File number(s): NSD 682 of 2021
Judgment of: HALLEY J
Date of judgment: 8 February 2022
Catchwords: CONTRACTS – interlocutory application to declare a binding and enforceable agreement between applicant and second respondent (Agreement) – where offer provided that bankrupt estate was to receive an amount estimated to be $220,000 by reference to figures in a report to creditors – where acceptance provided that bankrupt estate was to receive $220,000 – whether Agreement binding and enforceable – whether acceptance corresponded with offer or constituted a counter offer – whether material variation –where divergence in expression did not entail a difference in substance – where no material variation – where offer was a purported Calderbank offer – where draft deed of settlement provided subsequent to offer – whether offer was subject to entry into deed of settlement – application granted CONTRACTS – where third respondent opposed the making of a declaration on grounds that it would suffer prejudice and detriment – where third respondent not a party to the Agreement – whether third respondent has sufficient interest in the Agreement to oppose the declaration – where hypothetical prejudice to third respondent not sufficient to preclude making the declaration PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether solicitor for second respondent had authority to accept the offer – where solicitor has actual and ostensible authority where Agreement is actually and genuinely related to litigation
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 58, 82
Cases cited: Ashmere Cove Pty Ltd v Beekink (No 2) (2007) 244 ALR 534; [2007] FCA 1421 Baulkham Hills Private Hospital Pty Ltd v G R Securities Pty Ltd (1986) 4 NSWLR 622 Boreland v Docker [2007] NSWCA 94 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 153; [2001] NSWCA 61 Brookfield Australia Investments Ltd v Lucas Stuart Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1130 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 WLR 586 Clarence City Council v Commonwealth of Australia (2020) 280 FCR 265; [2020] FCAFC 134 Direct Factory Outlets Pty Ltd v Westfield Management Ltd (2003) 132 FCR 428; [2003] FCA 1095 Ex parte Fealey (1897) 18 LR (NSW) 282 Gall v Mitchell (1924) 35 CLR 222 G R Securities Pty Ltd v Baulkham Hills Private Hospital Pty Ltd (1986) 40 NSWLR 631 Jackson v Turquand (1869) LR 4 HL Lark v Outhwaite [1991] 2 Lloyd's Rep 132 Lewis v Combell Constructions Pty Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 528 Lucke v Cleary (2011) 111 SASR 134; [2011] SASCFC 118 Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353 Mulcaire v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd [2012] Ch 435; [2012] EWHC 3469 Mushroom Composters Pty Ltd v IS & DE Robertson Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 1 Olivaylle Pty Ltd v Flottweg GMBH & Co KGAA (No 4) (2009) 255 ALR 632; [2009] FCA 522 Outer Suburban Property Ltd v Clarke [1933] SASR 221 Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478 Pavlovic v Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd (2015) 90 NSWLR 605 Precision Pools Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1992) 37 FCR 554 Quadling v Robinson (1976) 137 CLR 192 R A Brierley Investments Limited v Landmark Corporation Limited (1966) 120 CLR 224 Ruhani v Director of Police (2005) 222 CLR 489; [2005] HCA 42
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate