Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Surefoot IP Holdings Pty Ltd v All Footings Solutions Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 119 File number(s): VID 298 of 2021
Judgment of: ROFE J
Date of judgment: 17 February 2022
Catchwords: PATENTS – application to amend claim – whether clerical error or obvious mistake – discretion of the Court
Legislation: Patents Act 1990 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Expo-Net Danmark A/S v Buono-Net Australia Pty Ltd (2010) 88 IPR 1 Farmhand Inc v Spadework Ltd [1975] RPC 617 Garford Pty Ltd v Dywidag-Systems International Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1039 General Tire and Rubber Co (Frost's) Patent [1972] RPC 259 Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex Pty Ltd (2010) 89 IPR 219 Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex Pty Ltd (2016) 247 FCR 61 Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd v Generic Partners Pty Ltd (No 2) (2019) 139 IPR 424 R v Commissioner of Patents; Ex parte Martin (1953) 89 CLR 381
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Patents and associated Statutes
Number of paragraphs: 55
Date of last submission/s: 31 January 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: C H Smith and R J Maguire
Solicitor for the Applicant: Arcadia Lawyers
Solicitor for the Respondents: DLA Piper
ORDERS VID 298 of 2021
BETWEEN: SUREFOOT IP HOLDINGS PTY LTD Applicant
AND: ALL FOOTINGS SOLUTIONS PTY LTD First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate