Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ferguson v Tasmanian Cricket Association (trading as Cricket Tasmania) (No 2) [2022] FCA 125 File number: VID 697 of 2021
Judgment of: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 16 February 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – r 2.32(3) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – s 37AF and s 37AG of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) (Act) – application to suppress access to originating application by non-parties – whether r 2.32(3) should be construed commensurately with s 37AG – whether the making of the order sought was justified by any of the grounds in s 37AG – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AF, 37AG Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 2.32
Cases cited: Ferguson v Tasmanian Cricket Association (trading as Cricket Tasmania) [2021] FCA 1507
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 16
Date of hearing: 16 February 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M McKenney
Solicitor for the Applicant: Wisewould Mahony
Counsel for the Interested Party: Mr K Read SC
Solicitor for the Interested Party: J.B. Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent did not appear
ORDERS VID 697 of 2021
BETWEEN: RENEE FERGUSON Applicant
AND: TASMANIAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION TRADING AS CRICKET TASMANIA (ABN 34 009 476 993) Respondent
order made by: BROMBERG J DATE OF ORDER: 16 february 2022
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate