Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Rauland Australia Pty Ltd v Johnson (No 3) [2022] FCA 138 File number: NSD 480 of 2019
Judgment of: stewart j
Date of judgment: 21 February 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for delivery up and destruction of documents containing applicant's confidential information – alternatively for injunction restraining such destruction – application for costs in the proceeding – relief or delivery up and destruction sought in interlocutory application same as final relief sought – where no well-founded fear of harm if documents destroyed because of backup copies – application dismissed
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
Number of paragraphs: 22
Date of hearing: 21 February 2022
Counsel for the Applicant S Prince SC with T Wong
Solicitor for the Applicant Workplace Law
Counsel for the Respondents I Jackman SC with P Knowles
Solicitor for the Respondents Norton White
ORDERS NSD 480 of 2019
BETWEEN: RAULAND AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 056 360 653) Applicant AND: FIONA JOHNSON Respondent HILLS LIMITED T/AS HILLS HEALTH SOLUTIONS (ACN
007 573 417) Second Respondent
order made by: STEWART J DATE OF ORDER: 21 February 2022
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant have leave to file an amended interlocutory application in the form provided to the Court during the hearing. 2. The applicant file the amended interlocutory application referred to in order 1 forthwith. 3. The applicant's amended interlocutory application be dismissed with costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate