Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Nicols as trustee of the bankrupt estate of Manietta v Manietta, in the matter of Manietta (No 2) [2022] FCA 142 File number: NSD 614 of 2020
Judgment of: CHEESEMAN J
Date of judgment: 24 February 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where parties unable to agree on an appropriate limit on the value of assets to be restrained by freezing orders – where freezing orders sought by the Bankruptcy Trustee were unlimited as to the value of assets to be restrained – where value of assets the subject of restraint likely to exceed the amount necessary to finalise the administration of the bankrupt estate – Held: limited freezing orders and related orders made. COSTS – costs of competing interlocutory applications concerning freezing orders –– where both parties partially successful – whether the circumstances warrant a departure from the ordinary rule as to costs – Held: Bankruptcy Trustee to pay 50% of the costs of the interlocutory applications of the first, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth respondents.
Cases cited: Nicols as trustee of the bankrupt estate of Manietta v Manietta, in the matter of Manietta [2022] FCA 39
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 36
Date of last submissions: 11 February 2022
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr C Freeman (written submissions only)
Solicitor for the Applicant: Nelson McKinnon Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr S White SC with Mr N Condylis (written submissions only)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate