Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Thorn (liquidator), in the matter of South Townsville Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) [2022] FCA 143 File number: NSD 1176 of 2021
Judgment of: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 23 February 2022
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application under s 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for approval nunc pro tunc of funding and related agreements entered into by liquidator – where agreements are for the purpose of funding extant litigation in this Court – considerations relevant to exercise of discretion PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for suppression orders – where orders sought in relation to funding agreements to enable pursuance of litigation in this Court by a liquidator PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by non-party for leave to be heard – considerations relevant to exercise of discretion – where non-party is a defendant in a separate proceeding brought by the plaintiff – application dismissed
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 477(2B) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AF, 37AG, 37AH Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) r 2.13
Cases cited: Brown v DML Resources Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 7) [2002] NSWSC 162; 41 ACSR 299 Brown v DML Resources Pty Ltd (in liq) [2001] NSWSC 590; 52 NSWLR 685 Deloughery v Weston [2017] NSWCA 148; 79 ACSR 180 Hancock (liquidator), in the matter of South Townsville Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) [2019] FCA 71 Hancock liquidator of South Townsville Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2019] FCA 622 In the matter of Octaviar Administration Pty Ltd (in liq) [2014] NSWSC 344 In the matter of One.Tel Ltd [2014] NSWSC 457 Jones, Saker, Weaver and Stewart (Liquidators), in the matter of Great Southern Ltd (in liq) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2012] FCA 1072 Kogan, in the matter of Rogulj Enterprises Pty Ltd (in liq) [2021] FCA 856 McGrath & Anor re HIH Insurance Ltd [2005] NSWSC 731 Motorola Solutions Inc v Hytera Communications Corporation Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 17 Needham, in the matter of Bruck Textile Technologies Pty Ltd (in liq) [2016] FCA 837 Onefone Australia Pty Ltd v OneTel Ltd [2010] NSWSC 498; 78 ACSR 163 Re Ambient Rail Pty Ltd (in liq); Ex parte Tonks [2019] FCA 1556 Re Bell Group Ltd (in liq) [2009] WASC 235 South Townsville Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) v Lauvan Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2021] FCA 941 South Townsville Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) v Lauvan Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 666 Stewart, in the matter of Newtronics Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1375
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate