Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International B.V. (Further Conduct of Proceedings) [2022] FCA 150 File number: NSD 1816 of 2004
Judgment of: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 25 February 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where matter remitted to primary judge and permanent stay of the cross-claim set aside – where application to amend defence to the cross-claim – whether permanent stay should be considered at trial – whether further material should be allowed
Legislation: Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 88
Cases cited: Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93 Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International B.V. (No 4) [2017] FCA 1345 Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International B.V. [2019] FCA 1772 Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International B.V. [2021] FCAFC 77; 389 ALR 612 Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International B.V. (No 2) [2021] FCAFC 120
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Trade Marks
Number of paragraphs: 16
Date of hearing: 15 February 2022
Counsel for the Cross-Claimants: Mr D Shavin QC with Ms C Cochrane SC
Solicitor for the Cross-Claimants: Quinn Emmanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
Counsel for the Cross-Respondent: Mr M Darke SC with Mr D Larish
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate