Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Mountain View Productions LLC v Keri Lee Charters Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 161 File number: NSD 74 of 2022
Judgment of: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 1 March 2022
Catchwords: ARBITRATION – international commercial arbitration – application for issue of subpoenas under s 23(3) of the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) – role of the arbitral tribunal in giving permission – relevant considerations for the Court – the Court's approach to the permission granted by the arbitral tribunal
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 28.46 International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) ss 16, 22, 22A, 23, 23A; Sch 2 Arts 1, 27 Commercial Arbitration Act 2013 (Qld) s 1 Revised Explanatory Memorandum, International Arbitration Amendment Bill 2010 (Cth)
Cases cited: Alinta Sales Pty Ltd v Woodside Energy Ltd [2008] WASC 304 ASADA v 34 Players and One Support Person [2014] VSC 635 Australian Gas Light Co v ACCC [2003] FCA 1101 Commissioner for Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 564 Esposito Holdings Pty Ltd v UDP Holdings Pty Ltd [2015] VSC 183 Rochfort v Trade Practices Commission [1982] HCA 66; 153 CLR 134 Samsung C&T Corporation, in the matter of Samsung C&T Corporation [2017] FCA 1169 Stemcor (A/sia) Pty Ltd v Oceanwave Line SA [2004] FCA 391 UDP Holdings Pty Ltd v Esposito Holdings Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 316
Division: General Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate