Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation (Australia) Pty Limited v Redbubble Limited (No 4) [2022] FCA 190 File number(s): QUD 403 of 2020
Judgment of: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 8 March 2022
Catchwords: CONTRACTS — construction — releases in settlement agreement — whether releases apply to proceeding — scope of dispute settled — scope of releases
Legislation: Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 26(1)(b)(i)
Cases cited: Damberg v Damberg [2001] NSWCA 87; (2001) 52 NSWLR 492 Grant v John Grant & Sons Proprietary Limited (1954) 91 CLR 112 Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation (Australia) Pty Limited v Redbubble Limited [2019] FCA 355; (2019) 369 ALR 408 Inland Revenue Commissioners v Raphael [1935] AC 96 LCA Marrickville Pty Limited v Swiss Re International SE [2022] FCAFC 17 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Limited v Wright Prospecting Pty Limited [2015] HCA 37; (2015) 256 CLR 104 Playcorp Group of Companies Pty Ltd v Peter Bodum A/S [2010] FCA 23; (2010) 84 IPR 542 Sarina v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 190; (2018) 365 ALR 15 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 52; (2004) 219 CLR 165
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Trade Marks
Number of paragraphs: 84
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate