Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Hennessy Building Pty Ltd v Pryce [2022] FCA 198 File number: QUD 437 of 2021
Judgment of: DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 8 March 2022
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – Creditor's Petition – adjournment pending resolution of proceedings – order made that respondents pay indemnity costs of petitioning creditor – serious unfounded allegations of fraud made by respondents justifying order LEGAL PROFESSION – allegations of fraud made by solicitor and barrister against litigants and their legal representatives – allegations utterly unfounded and demonstrably false – no care in the making of serious allegations in circumstances where the absence of dishonest conduct easily identifiable
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 7
Date of hearing: 8 March 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr R Gallo
Solicitor for the Applicant: Axia Litigation Lawyers
Counsel for the First and Second Respondents: Mr F Redmond
Solicitor for the First and Second Respondents: Ohlson Lawyers
ORDERS QUD 437 of 2021
BETWEEN: HENNESSY BUILDING PTY LTD ACN 117 587 998 Applicant
AND: SASKIA PRYCE First Respondent PETER JAMES MCQUITTY Second Respondent
order made by: DERRINGTON J DATE OF ORDER: 8 March 2022
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate