Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Wight, in the matter of I-Prosperity Pty Ltd (in liq) v LZYH Investments Pty Limited [2022] FCA 209 File number: QUD 13 of 2022
Judgment of: DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 7 March 2022
Catchwords: INSOLVENCY – company liquidation – voidable transaction being both an uncommercial and an insolvent transaction – default judgment PRACTICE – default judgment – claim under s 588FF of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – acceptance of facts in concise statement which were not challenged
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Capital Finance Australia Ltd v Tolcher (2007) 164 FCR 83 Chamberlain Group, Inc v Giant Alarm System Co Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 1606 Cooper v Commissioner of Taxation (2004) 139 FCR 205 Dean-Willcocks Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) (2004) 49 ACSR 325 Dwyer v R-Jay Pty Ltd [2007] SASC 115 Greig v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2011] QSC 129
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 28
Date of hearing: 7 March 2022
Counsel for the Plaintiffs: Mr M Taylor
Solicitor for the Plaintiffs: Hickey Lawyers
Counsel for the Defendant: The Defendant did not appear
Table of Corrections
10 March 2022 In paragraph 4, "Ms Gu" has been replaced with "Ms Bo" in two instances.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate