Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ogbonna v CTI Logistics Limited [2022] FCA 227 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal from Ogbonna v CTI Logistics Limited [2021] FCA 1664
File number: WAD 277 of 2021
Judgment of: JACKSON J
Date of judgment: 16 March 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - leave to appeal from interlocutory decisions - proceeding since dismissed - no substantial injustice - leave refused
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 21, 24, 31A, 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26.01
Cases cited: Charan v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2019] FCAFC 134 Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Durolek v Pier (WA) Pty Ltd [No 2] [2019] WASCA 138 Gerlach v Clifton Bricks Pty Ltd [2002] HCA 22; (2002) 209 CLR 478 Hastwell v Kott Gunning [2021] FCAFC 70 Jefferson Ford Pty Ltd v Ford Motor Co of Australia Ltd [2008] FCAFC 60; (2008) 167 FCR 372 Kowalski v MMAL Staff Superannuation Fund Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 117; (2009) 178 FCR 401 Ogbonna v CTI Logistics Ltd [2022] FCA 75 Piepkorn v Caroma Industries Ltd [2000] FCA 1230 Re JRL; Ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342 Talacko v Talacko [2010] FCA 239; (2010) 183 FCR 297 Weatherall v Satellite Receiving Systems (Australia) Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 741; (1999) 92 FCR 101
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate