Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pateras v State of Victoria [2022] FCA 238 File number(s): VID 318 of 2021
Judgment of: ANDERSON J
Date of judgment: 17 March 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – referee appointed to conduct a hearing and prepare a report for the Court pursuant to s 54A(1) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) and Division 28.6 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether the report should be adopted, varied, or rejected – referee report adopted in its entirety
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) Disability and Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Chocolate Factory Apartments v Westpoint Finance Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 784 Gulf Conveyor Systems Pty Limited v Gulf Integrated Solutions Pty Limited [2020] FCA 1534 James v WorkPower Inc [2018] FCA 2083 Ozmen Entertainment Pty Ltd v Neptune Hospitality Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 647 Seven Sydney Pty Ltd v Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 902 Shannon (in his capacity as receiver and manager of North East Wiradjuri Co Limited) v North East Wiradjuri Co Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 106 Sheehan v Lloyds Names Munich Re Syndicate Ltd [2017] FCA 1340 Super Pty Ltd v SJP Formwork (Aust) Pty Ltd (1992) 29 NSWLR 549
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate