Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Watson v Kriticos (Second Respondent's Summary Judgment Application) [2022] FCA 246 File number: NSD 970 of 2019
Judgment of: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 18 March 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where application for summary judgment and strikeout – where Fifth Further Amended Statement of Claim – whether available documentary record indicates reasonable prospects of success – whether pleadings defective
Cases cited: Chang v Registrar of Titles (1976) 137 CLR 177 Kern Corporation Ltd v Walker Reid Trading Pty Ltd (1987) 163 CLR 164 Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353 Watson v Kriticos (Summary Judgment) [2021] FCA 261
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Patents and Associated Statutes
Number of paragraphs: 38
Date of hearing: 23 February 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr G Campbell
Solicitor for the Applicant: Heathfield Grosvenor Lawyers Pty Ltd
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr D Ananian-Cooper
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Plastiras Lawyers
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr V Bedrossian SC
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: MinterEllison
ORDERS NSD 970 of 2019
BETWEEN: DALE CAMERON WATSON Applicant
AND: STEPHEN CON KRITICOS First Respondent
WHITEWATER WEST INDUSTRIES LTD. Second Respondent
order made by: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 18 March 2022
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate