Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Mazda Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 250 File number(s): VID 1169 of 2019
Judgment of: O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 21 March 2022
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – misleading and deceptive conduct –where respondent contravened ss 18(1) and 29(1)(m) of Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) by making false representations concerning the existence or effect of consumer guarantees – form of declarations
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Schedule 2 ss 18(1), 29(1)(m)
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v LG Electronics Australia Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 96 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Mazda Australia Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 1493 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Midland Brick Co Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 693; (2004) 207 ALR 329 Rural Press Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 216 CLR 53 Warramunda Village Inc v Pryde (2001) 105 FCR 437
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Economic Regulator, Competition and Access
Number of paragraphs: 11
Date of last submission/s: 10 March 2022
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr NP De Young QC with Ms NJ Hickey and Ms AF Garsia
Solicitor for the Applicant: Webb Henderson
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr MR Scott QC with Mr MJ Hoyne
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mills Oakley
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate