Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Krishnan v Estee Lauder Pty Ltd (No 3) [2022] FCA 275 File number: WAD 156 of 2021
Judgment of: BANKS-SMITH J
Date of judgment: 28 February 2022
Date of publication of reasons: 24 March 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for suppression or non-publication orders pursuant to s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) - identification of name and address of applicant - identification of personal or financial information - whether order necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice or to protect the safety of any person - application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AA, 37AE, 37AF, 37AG Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.16, 2.32, 11.01
Cases cited: AB (A Pseudonym) v R (No 3) [2019] NSWCCA 46; (2019) 97 NSWLR 1046 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission [2010] HCA 21; (2010) 240 CLR 651 Huikeshoven v Secretary, Department of Education, Skills and Employment [2021] FCA 1359 Krishnan v Estee Lauder Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 273
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 17
Date of hearing: 28 February 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr D Larish
Solicitor for the Respondent: Baker McKenzie
ORDERS WAD 156 of 2021
BETWEEN: MEENAKSHI KRISHNAN Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate