Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Gallagher on behalf of the Wanggil Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2022] FCA 286 File number(s): WAD 274 of 2019
Judgment of: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 28 March 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to set aside subpoena – where subpoena issued to representative body in the context of a claimant application over land forming part of larger area likely to be subject to a larger claim – numerous objections to subpoena – objections overruled and application to set aside subpoena refused NATIVE TITLE – subpoena over material created to prove connection to land or waters – where material accepted to be in the control of a prescribed body corporate as successor to native title applicant – where subpoena issued to representative body rather than prescribed body corporate – where evidence indicates that the prescribed body corporate does not resist production of the material
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 37M Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), s 94L
Cases cited: Associated Dominions Assurance Society Pty Ltd v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd (1955) 72 WN (NSW) 250 Cheinmora v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2013] FCA 769 Neowarra v State of Western Australia [2004] FCA 1092 Rinehart v Rinehart [2018] NSWSC 1102 Tommy on behalf of the Yinhawangka Gobawarrah People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2019] FCA 1551 Ward v State of Western Australia [2006] FCA 1848
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate