Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
AFB20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 299 Appeal from: AFB20 v Minister for Immigration [2021] FCCA 1862
File number: NSD 934 of 2021
Judgment of: SNADEN J
Date of judgment: 30 March 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – applicant's visa cancelled on character grounds – applicant subsequently applied for protection visa – application for protection visa rejected by delegate of first respondent – application for review of delegate's decision before second respondent ("Tribunal") – Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision – application for judicial review of Tribunal decision before Federal Circuit Court of Australia ("FCCA") – application dismissed – appeal from FCCA judgment – appellant alleged that Tribunal erred by failing to consider contention that he faced risk of significant harm if returned to home country on account of mental health problems – no such contention advanced before Tribunal – Tribunal not obliged to consider risk of harm on account of mental health – primary judge so found – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36, 501
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 236 FCR 593 CAR15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2019) 272 FCR 131 DQM18 v Minister for Home Affairs (2020) 278 FCR 529 Minister for Home Affairs v Buadromo (2018) 267 FCR 320 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar (2019) 272 FCR 589 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v Viane (2021) 96 ALJR 13 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1 Navoto v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 135
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate