Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BRR17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 304 Appeal from: BRR17 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 222
File number: VID 202 of 2019
Judgment of: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 30 March 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – unrepresented litigant – appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit Court – whether rejection of claim that inconsistencies in his evidence were the result of the poor quality of interpretation was illogical – whether making an assessment of the standard of interpreting was erroneous – appeal dismissed
Cases cited: CQG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 146 DAO16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 2
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 20
Date of hearing: 24 March 2022
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person with the assistance of an interpreter
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ms I Ward of Sparke Helmore Lawyers
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent filed a submitting notice save as to costs
ORDERS VID 202 of 2019
BETWEEN: BRR17 Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
order made by: BROMBERG J DATE OF ORDER: 30 March 2022
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate