Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BUG16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 325 Appeal from: BUG16 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2020] FCCA 1203
File number: VID 400 of 2020
Judgment of: ANASTASSIOU J
Date of judgment: 4 April 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court –protection visa application – whether Administrative Appeals Tribunal failed to make an obvious inquiry by not arranging for the Appellant to visit, and be examined by, a Commonwealth medical officer – whether Tribunal fell into jurisdictional error by illogically or unreasonably rejecting important parts of Appellant's claims – whether Tribunal failed to take into account mandatory relevant considerations – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 36, 60, 65, 415, 427
Cases cited: Abebe v Commonwealth [1999] HCA 14, 197 CLR 510 Aggarwal v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1312 AMT15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 366 Applicant M190 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1362 Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin [1990] HCA 21; 170 CLR 1 CBS15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1431 Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1989] HCA 62; 169 CLR 379 CQG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 146; 253 FCR 496 CRU18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 129; 277 FCR 493 DYS16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 33; 260 FCR 260 ENT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 217 March v E & MH Stramare Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 12; 171 CLR 506 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration & Citizenship v SZGUR [2011] HCA 1; 241 CLR 594 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11; 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; 264 CLR 541 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Le [2007] FCA 1318; 164 FCR 151 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] HCA 39; 83 ALJR 1123 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZNVW [2010] FCAFC 41; 183 FCR 575 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT [2013] FCA 317; 212 FCR 99 Minister for the Environment v Sharma [2022] FCAFC 35 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263; 144 FCR 1 NADR v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 167 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Cohen [2001] HCA 10; 75 ALJR 542 SZNBX v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 1403 SZUWX v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 77
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate